·Home
 ·Agenda
 ·Logistics
 ·Background Information
 ·Related Links
 ·Contact Information

Background Information:

 

Geoffrey Briggs "Center for Mars Exploration" presentation during the first ISSE workshop.

 

 

NASA Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) chart.

 

The MADD Project is an element of the Astrobiology Technology and Instrument Development Program begun toward the end of the first quarter of FY 2003. The project has the goal of demonstrating a substantially automated, lightweight, low-power drill that will be capable of acquiring aseptic core samples from tens of meters below the surface of Mars.

 

 

Journal of Geophysical Research Article "Strategies for Drilling on Mars" by K.A. Zacny and G.A. Cooper. 

 

 

 

Mining, Resource Utilization & Space Exploration conference in Kentucky on November 2-4, 1993.

 
  • Deep drilling has provided us with important insights into the history of Earth and into the question of how life arose on our planet:

    • Antarctic ice cores provide evidence of past climate over many millions of years together with samples of micro-organisms from the past
    • Cores of sediments from the ocean bottom provide similar evidence
    • Ground water samples from great depth contain microorganisms that evidently can survive and reproduce using chemical energy sources (e.g., hydrogen and carbon dioxide) as opposed to energy from the sun (for photosynthesis to start the food chain)
    • Samples to be acquired in the near future (under strict aseptic conditions) from Antarctica’s Lake Vostok (under 4 km of ice) may produce similar surprises
    Together these samples from the Earth’s interior are stimulating the formulation of new ideas about how life may have evolved on Earth and on other planets as well as about the causes and amplitudes of climate change.
    Gaining access to samples from depth on Mars is expected to be equally productive in addressing similar scientific questions and certainly will be technically more challenging. Deep drilling on Mars is a declared high priority for Mars exploration and may well precede the return from Mars of the first surface samples.
  • Ongoing Research relevant to Mars Deep Drilling
    Stimulated by a) the results of terrestrial deep drilling, b) models of the martian interior that predict the presence of brines at depth, and c) a feasibility study of the technology needed to drill on Mars, NASA has been supporting several drill technology developments for several years. These include hardware developments (by Swales Inc, and by Honeybee Robotics) supported by the Mars Technology Program and a combination of hardware development and field research supported by the Astrobiology Program (a Mars/Arctic drill -- built by NASA JSC -- and the Honeybee drill to be used at Rio Tinto in Spain). The Mars/Arctic research project includes a unique laboratory effort aimed at understanding the fundamental differences between drilling on Earth and under extreme martian conditions.

    In addition, the NASA Astrobiology Institute supports an international program aimed at coordinating continental drilling projects of astrobiological significance. Much has been learned about the nature and ages of crucial sedimentary successions but sampling for indicators of early life (microfossils, biomarker molecules, stable isotope ratios, organosedimentary structures, etc.) has been hampered by the limited availability of unweathered, unoxidized, and uncontaminated rock samples.

  • The Principal Challenges that we face in preparing to drill on Mars


    • Where to Drill?
    – “Follow the Subsurface Water” will be the guide and identifying optimal drill sites calls for a combination of existing maps of the surface and future GPR maps of the subsurface (to shallow depths and to depths of a few kilometers) that will be acquired by Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Mars Express, respectively.
    – Ideally, geophysical (e-m) sounding would take place at a drilling site prior to the start of penetration

    • Given the poorly characterized environment presented by the martian subsurface, basic physics research is needed to compensate for our ignorance.
    – Drill physics laboratory research with a complete range of plausible materials and undertaken at ultra low pressure and temperature
    – Bit temperature control is vital given ubiquitous martian ground ice
    – Cuttings removal in the absence of drilling fluids
    – No existing bit design meets our need re. wear & range of material hardness
    – No existing auger design is adequate for reliable cuttings removal for all the materials we may encounter
    – A variety of sensors need to be built into the bit (e.g., for temperature measurements, resistivity of clays near melting temperatures, accelerations) together with a means of transmitting the data to the surface (a problem for conventional drill strings) to allow autonomous control

    • Low Mass
    – For robotic missions only a few tens of kilograms will be available which immediately implies dry drilling – fundamentally different from conventional drilling where a fluid is used to cool the bit and to remove cuttings; this different approach is a major reason for the required fundamental lab research
    – For deep penetration new drilling approaches are likely necessary e.g., a cable tool approach to eliminate drill string

    • Power
    – The limitations of solar power are not severe because of the need to keep the bit from over heating but rate of penetration will be very limited

    • Automation
    • Terrestrial drilling systems are fundamentally different from the kind we will use on Mars so there is little to learn from this direction. We need:
    – Intelligent interpretation of sensor inputs/rapid control loop
    – Avoidance of catastrophic and problem situations (e.g., melting and refreezing of ground ice, pebbles damaging the bit, jamming due to auger failures)
    – Dealing with abrupt changes in strata
    – Optimization of drilling efficiency
    – Core sample handling after acquisition

    • Instrumentation
    – In addition to already available sample analysis instrumentation, it is highly desirable to develop miniature logging instruments (camera, gamma ray spectrometer …) to take full advantage of micro-boreholes drilled on Mars

    • Testing
    – All hardware developers carry out laboratory testing under ambient conditions
    – Field testing is also carried out at terrestrial analog sites -- desert sites, Rio Tinto and Arctic
    – Terrestrial analogs are only part of the answer because testing in the unique small Mars test cell at UCBerkeley has demonstrated fundamental differences when drilling is conducted at martian pressures and temperatures: heat loss processes are different; bits perform differently; cuttings removal is highly sensitive to the ice content of the material; and the performance of augers is also different
    – The UCB research (which can handle only penetrations of about 15 cm) indicates the need for eventual full scale testing of hardware and its autonomous control under ultra low P and T; depth penetration of may meters will be required to acquire confidence in any system i.e. to demonstrate TRL 6 capability. Test parameters need to be defined for HQ by qualified, un-conflicted scientists and engineers..

    • Forward and Backward Planetary Protection
    • Initially we need only be concerned about forward contamination since this can lead to false positives (an increasing concern as instrumentation achieves ever-higher sensitivity). In time, and especially during the human exploration phase, we will have to address backward contamination issues – containment of cuttings and cores. Progress has been made in developing tracer techniques for assessing the radial depth to which contamination can penetrate cores retrieved in analog environments from sandstone and from ground ice. Similar experiments need to be conducted in full scale testing under martian conditions to provide the necessary confidence that we have an adequate means of dealing with the problem.

  • Overcoming these interconnected challenges will benefit greatly from an integrated approach. At the same time, competition is a vital aspect of the development of martian subsurface exploration capability. This competition is provided by the three different hardware developers (Swales, Honeybee, and NASA JSC) as well as developments in Canada, Italy and perhaps elsewhere. Instrumentation development is also competitively developed by the community. Given this healthy intrinsic competition, we propose to carry out an integrated effort to overcome the other challenges including primarily:
    Astrobiology and Geophysics, Drill Physics Research, Automation, Full Scale Testing and Planetary Protection with close cognizance of the other challenges: Drill System

    -Hardware and Instrumentation.
    Qualifications of NASA Ames and its Partners (NAI, UCB, UK, LBNL, LPI, SETI Institute) to undertake such an integrated Mars subsurface exploration project

    -Astrobiology and Geophysics
    NASA Ames has NASA’s core competency in Astrobiology. It is the site of the NASA Astrobiology Institute which already supports a terrestrial drilling project as well as individual subsurface research projects at a number of its constituent teams.

    -The NASA Ames-led ASTID drill project has theoretical geophysicist Stephen Clifford of the Lunar and Planetary Institute as a key member of its team. The highly experienced experimental geophysics group at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has links with UCB and with NASA Ames. An ASTID proposal from LBNL is under evaluation.

    -Drill Physics Research
    The unique Mars drill physics laboratory at UC Berkeley is supported by the NASA Ames-led ASTID drill project.
    The University of Kentucky Mechanical Engineering Department is a partner of Ames and is a world leader in predictive performance models and optimization techniques for drilling. An ASTID proposal from UK is under evaluation.

    -Automation
    NASA Ames provides the Agency with core competency in automation and robotics. As part of an ASTID project, Ames has begun the process of automating the NASA JSC Mars/Arctic drill, starting with the UCB test set-up. Ames is also undertaking the automation of the Honeybee Mars/Rio Tinto drill and under an ASTID project has carried out first field tests of a Honeybee drill at the Haughton Crater.

    -Full Scale Testing
    NASA Ames has a tower building, originally intended for full scale testing of Atlas launch vehicles, that can be pumped down to martian pressures (~ 5 torr) (pumping is carried out by the systems that operate the Ames arc jets). This unique facility is able to accommodate apparatus as high as 25 meters and would therefore be an ideal basis for full scale testing of Mars drills that are intended to penetrate to depths of a few to tens of meters. Cooling of test rigs and test strata to appropriate temperatures is deemed to be a straightforward engineering task.

    -Planetary Protection
    Ames has a long history of involvement in Planetary Protection policy development and retains this expertise through investigators affiliated with the nearby SETI Institute. In addition, Ames Astrobiology CS conduct regular field expeditions to collect samples of various kinds (including permafrost cores) where contamination of the samples is always an important consideration. This experience has been translated into the field experiments of core contamination mentioned above.

 


Responsible NASA Official: Greg Schmidt
Curator: Lockheed Martin